Brown Streak

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
A

Anonymous

Guest
In light of the video coming out of Ybor and the Cpl down there clearly wearing META glasses to record [edited for violation of Terms of Use], has anyone else heard that the sergeants who recently took the lieutenants test were wearing META glasses to cheat on the test?? Apparently the city knows about this but wants to sweep it under
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This department is a fucking joke. Hire garbage, promote garbage, then wonder why shit goes sideways.

Thank god the pay is good.
 
How about the worthless Cpl diversity promotion that should have never been promoted? He witness an officer throw water on a citizen and when the guy comes to say something instead of being a supervisor he walks off like he saw nothing. Why is he not being I investigated for failure to supervise? If he were white he would have been relieved of duty already. What did Bobby do again to get relieved for failure to supervise? [Last sentence deleted for violation of Terms of Use]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andwers said:
How about the worthless Cpl diversity promotion that should have never been promoted? He witness an officer throw water on a citizen and when the guy comes to say something instead of being a supervisor he walks off like he saw nothing. Why is he not being I investigated for failure to supervise? If he were white he would have been relieved of duty already. What did Bobby do again to get relieved for failure to supervise? [Last sentence deleted for violation of Terms of Use]
Click to expand...
Vinny not Bobby. Auto correct
 
Is Reggie James a reserve officer with Tampa police department. A Retired officer working working at the club now. Wow
 
The Lieutenant you spoke to at the 711 works in the Tampa police pba office, why don’t your respond there.
 
Why is Jerry still allowed to supervise? Why hasnt he been relieved of duty? [Sentence deleted for violation of Terms of Use] I’m so sick of this admin they are a joke and have ruined this department.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andwers said:
Why is Jerry still allowed to supervise? Why hasnt he been relieved of duty? [Sentence deleted for violation of Terms of Use] I’m so sick of this admin they are a joke and have ruined this department.
Click to expand...
“Afraid”
 
OK guys, some of you are starting to get a little carried away with commentary, so please allow me to reel you back in a little. This is NOT a Slam site. When you're talking about a particular person (identified by where he works and his rank) wearing META glasses for his own perverted pleasure or disparaging the Chief with colorful adjectives and nouns, that's UNACCEPTABLE. Whether you believe me or not, both you and the site lose credibility when you do so. If you have a point to make or position to take and cannot do so without slamming someone against our Terms of Use, then I'm sorry to say that your justification for doing so is NOT strong enough. There is a difference between asking if anyone heard about a group of people wearing META glasses to cheat on a test and stating that a particular officer did something. You can post displeasure with the Chief, but not by slamming him with insults. With all due respect, calling the Chief a coward while hiding behind an anonymous username is like the proverbial pot calling the kettle black. I'm cleaning up some of the conversations in here (I'm not deleting the entire string this time) and, if anyone has a problem with it, you can contact Chip or start a message board of your own.
 
sysop said:
OK guys, some of you are starting to get a little carried away with commentary, so please allow me to reel you back in a little. This is NOT a Slam site. When you're talking about a particular person (identified by where he works and his rank) wearing META glasses for his own perverted pleasure or disparaging the Chief with colorful adjectives and nouns, that's UNACCEPTABLE. Whether you believe me or not, both you and the site lose credibility when you do so. If you have a point to make or position to take and cannot do so without slamming someone against our Terms of Use, then I'm sorry to say that your justification for doing so is NOT strong enough. There is a difference between asking if anyone heard about a group of people wearing META glasses to cheat on a test and stating that a particular officer did something. You can post displeasure with the Chief, but not by slamming him with insults. With all due respect, calling the Chief a coward while hiding behind an anonymous username is like the proverbial pot calling the kettle black. I'm cleaning up some of the conversations in here (I'm not deleting the entire string this time) and, if anyone has a problem with it, you can contact Chip or start a message board of your own.
Click to expand...
This site and you are a coward and a joke.
 
Andwers said:
This site and you are a coward and a joke.
Click to expand...
You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but the evidence suggests you're ignorant of the facts! The news articles in the Main forum area prove the current site owner(s) have a history of fighting to protect the identities of their posters. That is indisputable. They not only paid to hire attorney Luke Lirot and fight a 1-year legal battle against the HCSO, but they WON! That's only one case, although easily the most famous. Agencies grew to know that they didn't stand a change of getting identifying user information. That cost the users of this site exactly NOTHING.

Chip's already explained that he does not want to be associated with a site that is closed and that slams people. If it's closed (i.e. registered users only), the media and public will not have access, they will now know what's going on, and it will basically become a bitch session without anything positive coming out of it. If it's a slam sight, the reputation will diminish and media sources will be unwilling to print or cover the content (and rightfully so).

So if you think this site and myself are cowards and a joke, we'll happily accept your criticism because we know we're doing the right thing for the right reason. If you want to do things a different way, you're more than welcome to...but we want nothing to do with it.

For those who understand what we're trying to do here in effecting positive change, thanks for your support and trust.
 
Still waiting on the Cpl that took no action and ran away to be addressed for failure to supervise. But they won’t well alll know why.
 
Back
Top